Russia Seeks Staggering Amount in Damages from Euroclear Regarding Frozen Assets
Russia's monetary authority has declared it is seeking compensation amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a clear warning from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use frozen Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.
The Legal Claim
According to reports in local state media, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.
European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and financial needs.
Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.
Dispute on Ownership
EU officials have argued that their proposal is legally sound. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU jurisdictions following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Moscow, in contrast, has called any utilization of the assets as theft. It has threatened retaliatory measures, including confiscating EU private investors' assets within Russia.
The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent role in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.
Strategic Positioning
In comments interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."
Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.
Legal Hurdles Ahead
While judges in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with closer relations to the Kremlin.
"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that relevant assets can be identified," stated a lawyer from an international firm.
European Safeguards
European authorities said they are developing steps to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing protections to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."
How the Funding Would Work
Under the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would stay untouched.
Ukraine would only be obligated to return the money in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.
Alternative Proposals
The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.
This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.
Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is also significant," she remarked. "It also sends a clear message that when you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."